Sunday, 24 April 2011

Queen Victoria's gown offers hints on Middleton's

http://l.yimg.com/kz/api/res/1.2/RrV8Gp3_.y0Nns8FwdZCEA--/YXBwaWQ9Y2JlO3c9MTkw/http://l.yimg.com/os/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/6033728ef3741608eb0e6a70670094dd.jpgIn this undated photo released by the Royal Collection on Thursday April 21 2011, a conservator holds  Princess Charlotte's elaborate cloth-of-silver empire line wedding dress embroidered with flowers and trimmed with Brussels lace. This remarkable, glittering dress (worn when the princess married Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg in 1816) is 195-years-old, the oldest royal wedding dress that Historic Royal Palaces cares for. As speculation continues as to the design of Catherine Middleton’s wedding dress, a precious collection of historic royal wedding dresses worn by royal brides over the last 200 years have just undergone over 1000 hours of conservation treatment by conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces. The wedding dresses belonging to Princess Charlotte (1816), Queen Victoria (1840), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), Princess Mary of Teck (1893), Princess Margaret (1960) and Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963) are usually carefully stored at Kensington Palace but have been made available to the media and are viewable on the Historic Royal Palaces website. (AP Photo/The Royal Collection/Historic Royal Palaces) MANDATORY CREDIT.  NO ARCHIVE NO SALES.  SINGLE USE AND IN RELATION TO THE ROYAL WEDDING ONLYIn this undated photo released by the Royal Collection on Thursday April 21 2011, the royal wedding dresses worn by (left - right) Princess Margaret (1960), Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963), Princess Charlotte (1816), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), and Princess Mary of Teck (1893). As speculation continues as to the design of Catherine Middleton’s wedding dress, a precious collection of historic royal wedding dresses worn by royal brides over the last 200 years have just undergone over 1000 hours of conservation treatment by conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces. The wedding dresses belonging to Princess Charlotte (1816), Queen Victoria (1840), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), Princess Mary of Teck (1893), Princess Margaret (1960) and Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963) are usually carefully stored at Kensington Palace but have been made available to the media and are viewable on the Historic Royal Palaces website. (AP Photo/The Royal Collection/Historic Royal Palaces) MANDATORY CREDIT.  NO ARCHIVE NO SALES.  SINGLE USE AND IN RELATION TO THE ROYAL WEDDING ONLYIn this undated photo released by the Royal Collection on Thursday April 21 2011, a white satin dress decorated with a pattern of British and Irish flowers, tied together with a lovers knot was worn by Princess (Victoria) Mary of Teck when she married Prince George, Duke of York (later King George V) in 1893. As speculation continues as to the design of Catherine Middleton’s wedding dress, a precious collection of historic royal wedding dresses worn by royal brides over the last 200 years have just undergone over 1000 hours of conservation treatment by conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces. The wedding dresses belonging to Princess Charlotte (1816), Queen Victoria (1840), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), Princess Mary of Teck (1893), Princess Margaret (1960) and Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963) are usually carefully stored at Kensington Palace but have been made available to the media and are viewable on the Historic Royal Palaces website. (AP Photo/The Royal Collection/Historic Royal Palaces) MANDATORY CREDIT.  NO ARCHIVE NO SALES.  SINGLE USE AND IN RELATION TO THE ROYAL WEDDING ONLYIn this undated photo released by the Royal Collection on Thursday April 21 2011, the silk satin wedding dress worn by Queen Victoria in 1840, when she married Albert Saxe-Coburg, is prepared by a conservator for conservation work to begin. As speculation continues as to the design of Catherine Middleton’s wedding dress, a precious collection of historic royal wedding dresses worn by royal brides over the last 200 years have just undergone over 1000 hours of conservation treatment by conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces. The wedding dresses belonging to Princess Charlotte (1816), Queen Victoria (1840), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), Princess Mary of Teck (1893), Princess Margaret (1960) and Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963) are usually carefully stored at Kensington Palace but have been made available to the media and are viewable on the Historic Royal Palaces website. (AP Photo/The Royal Collection/Historic Royal Palaces) MANDATORY CREDIT.  NO ARCHIVE NO SALES.  SINGLE USE AND IN RELATION TO THE ROYAL WEDDING ONLYIn this undated photo released by the Royal Collection on Thursday April 21 2011, a conservator puts finishing touches to the simple but stunning wedding dress worn by HRH Princess Margaret when she married Lord Snowdon in 1960. The glamorous dress comprised a fitted bodice and a full skirt of fine diaphanous silk. As speculation continues as to the design of Catherine Middleton’s wedding dress, a precious collection of historic royal wedding dresses worn by royal brides over the last 200 years have just undergone over 1000 hours of conservation treatment by conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces. The wedding dresses belonging to Princess Charlotte (1816), Queen Victoria (1840), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), Princess Mary of Teck (1893), Princess Margaret (1960) and Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963) are usually carefully stored at Kensington Palace but have been made available to the media and are viewable on the Historic Royal Palaces website. (AP Photo/The Royal Collection/Historic Royal Palaces) MANDATORY CREDIT.  NO ARCHIVE NO SALES.  SINGLE USE AND IN RELATION TO THE ROYAL WEDDING ONLYIn this undated photo released by the Royal Collection on Thursday April 21 2011, a conservator puts finishing touches to Princess Charlotte's wedding dress (1816). This elaborate cloth-of-silver empire line dress embroidered with flowers and trimmed with Brussels lace, worn when the Princess married Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg, is 195-years-old, the oldest royal wedding dress that Historic Royal Palaces cares for.As speculation continues as to the design of Catherine Middleton’s wedding dress, a precious collection of historic royal wedding dresses worn by royal brides over the last 200 years have just undergone over 1000 hours of conservation treatment by conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces. The wedding dresses belonging to Princess Charlotte (1816), Queen Victoria (1840), Alexandra of Denmark (1863), Princess Mary of Teck (1893), Princess Margaret (1960) and Princess Alexandra of Kent (1963) are usually carefully stored at Kensington Palace but have been made available to the media and are viewable on the Historic Royal Palaces website. (AP Photo/The Royal Collection/Historic Royal Palaces) MANDATORY CREDIT.  NO ARCHIVE NO SALES.  SINGLE USE AND IN RELATION TO THE ROYAL WEDDING ONLY The celebrated silk-and-lace bridal gown worn by Queen Victoria offers some clues about what Kate Middleton will wear when she walks down the aisle on April 29, even if much has changed since Victoria's low-key wedding in 1840.
Victoria didn't have to get married in front of live TV cameras with thousands of reporters and photographers camped outside. And she tied the knot in a relatively small private chapel, not the cavernous chamber of London's Westminster Abbey.
That means a small basic dress like Victoria's simply won't do for Middleton, said Joanna Marschner, senior curator at Britain's Historic Royal Palaces, which takes care of Victoria's gown and other dresses worn by past royal brides.


"The dress has to rise to the occasion," said Marschner. "It has to be big, it has to stand up to the scale of the space and stand up to the scrutiny of all those eyes. It has to carry the day, it has to say something about our time, and it has to be the choice of the bride. She has to be comfortable in it."
Despite intense interest, the identity of Middleton's designer and the style of her dress have remained a closely held secret. Palace officials say Middleton wants to surprise fiance Prince William when she steps out of her Rolls-Royce to cross the Abbey threshold.
Marschner would not make any predictions, except to say that the designer must respect the decorum associated with Westminster Abbey. That means a strapless gown or a plunging neckline are unlikely — Middleton will probably have to wait for an evening reception at Buckingham Palace if she wants to wear something more revealing.
The only generally accepted guideline is that the designer will be British. Just as Victoria used English lace and silk woven in London to show support for British industry, Middleton faces overwhelming pressure to use a British designer.
Attention has focused on Sarah Burton, creative director at the prominent Alexander McQueen house, or Sophie Cranston, the lesser-known founder of the Libelula label or Bruce Oldfield, a prominent favorite of the late Princess Diana.
Cranston's name surfaced this week with press reports naming her as a possible dark horse contender for the most coveted dress commission in years.
"My thought is everyone who has been mentioned is in the running," said Astrid Joss, shopping editor at Brides magazine. "Sophie Cranston has as good a chance as anyone. It's realistic, Kate has worn her pieces. It is understated, she does slim, elegant dresses that suit Kate's style."
Choosing Cranston would be a way for Middleton to champion smaller, less expensive local designers, Joss said.
Victoria also had to make some political choices when assembling her wedding outfit.
Marschner said Victoria made sure to support English workers by using lace from the West Country village of Honiton and silk woven in the country.
The cream-colored gown worn by Victoria is so fragile it can only be handled by experts wearing gloves, but it will soon undergo a major conservation treatment so it can be put on public display at Kensington Palace next year. Conservators from Britain's Historic Royal Palaces have spent over 1,000 hours treating a precious collection of royal bridal gowns, some of which date back nearly 200 years.
"Victoria's dress is a watershed in royal fashion history," said Marschner. "Earlier royal brides were pawns used to seal alliances or bring countries together; Victoria married for love, and she kept the dress for sentimental reasons. Her wedding is remembered as a golden day."
She said Victoria's wedding sparked public interest in royal weddings, laying the foundation for the global interest in the 1981 nuptials of Prince Charles and Diana Spencer and the frenzy now over next week's royal wedding of Prince William and Middleton.
In the decades after her wedding, Victoria wore lace that had been detached from the wedding gown for special occasions. She even wore the lace over black dresses after the death of her husband, Prince Albert, to remind people of her love for him.
Rosemary Harden, manager of the Fashion Museum in Bath, hopes Middleton will incorporate some English lace into her gown to keep the tradition going.
"Kate wants it to be a surprise," Harden said. "And I say good luck to her. I think that's lovely."

No comments:

Post a Comment

please poll if you like this site?